Forgot Password?
Home arrow GreeniacsArticles arrow Wildlife arrow Animals and Testing
Written by Brandon King   
Share |
Thursday, 08 July 2010

Animals and Testing
This decade has brought a number of environmental issues to the forefront of public consciousness, words like global warming, carbon footprint, and deforestation have become part of our everyday vocabulary. As these environmental issues have become more prominent, so have others receded, with mantras of “save the rainforest” and “save the whales” being left behind in the 1990s. Animal testing is another issue that, while still contentious, does not form as large a part of public discourse as it once did. While the argument against it is not particularly loud these days, animal research continues to play a large part in both the medical and cosmetics industries. There are multiple perspectives surrounding this difficult issue, as discussed in this article.

The Pro-Animal Testing Argument:
The purpose of animal testing is to determine the “safety and efficacy”1 of a product or procedure before it is used by or conducted on humans. While cosmetics can often be accurately tested on non-living things, medical procedures often cannot, as treatments must be evaluated in terms of their overall effect on a “whole living system”2 rather than an isolated organ. Today, and into the foreseeable future, animals are the only option for doing that. In the words of Frankie Trull, president of the Foundation for Biomedical Research: “[animals] are not a perfect mimic of a human, but they’re as close as we’re going to get without using a human.”3

The majority of animal testing is performed on invertebrates, not invertebrates. While videos of immobilized, caged monkeys and sad Dobermans squealing in pain proliferate on the internet, the tests they depict are not widespread: “cats, dogs, and non-human primates”4 represent less than one percent of animal research. Instead, it is usually fruit flies and nematode worms that scientists test, which they are free to do without government regulation. These invertebrates are used because they have short life spans, can be housed in large numbers, and are cost effective. Their simple, easy to understand anatomy provides scientists with another advantage. Because Cephalopods are the only invertebrates protected under United States law, the total number of invertebrates tested each year is unknown.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, excluding invertebrates, 1,177,566 animals were used in tests in the US in 2005.5 This figure also excludes rats and mice, which researchers are not required to register but which represent “95% of all animals used in research.”6 The animal used in a test depends on what a scientist is studying. For example, neurological compounds are often tested in cats, because cats have a neurological system that “closely mimics that of a human.”7 Dogs and pigs are used for cardiovascular studies, with Beagles being the preferred species of dog because of their mild disposition. Albino rabbits are commonly used in eye irritancy tests by cosmetics companies because they lack a tear duct, which allows for a rapid progression of observable symptoms.

The importance of animal testing for medical purposes is highlighted by the fact that a full “60% of potential drugs [are] rejected at the animal testing stage.”8 The fact is that animal testing is essential to modern day medical research, and is responsible for many of modern history’s breakthroughs: blood transfusions, insulin, the polio vaccine, heart transplants, and deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease to name a few. All these discoveries owe at least part of their existence to research performed using animals. You can view a full timeline of breakthroughs resulting from animal research by clicking here here.

The Argument Against Animal Testing:
In comparison to animal testing for medical research, animal testing by cosmetics companies seems at best superfluous and at worst downright cruel. The most commonly animal-tested products are eye shadows and soaps.9 These products are evaluated using a number of different tests, the names of which include: skin sensitization, skin irritancy, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity.10 Lethal dosage tests are used to determine the lowest amount of a substance that can kill a group of animals. The most infamous is the LD50 test, which forces subjects to ingest a substance until half of them die.11

The reason that something as inhumane as testing on invertebrates continues to this day is that computer and mathematical models, no matter how advanced, are not as accurate predictors of a chemical’s effect as living animals are. Still, there are alternative ways for companies to test the impact of their chemicals on customers. “Cell and skin tissue cultures [and] corneas from eye banks” are two ways to explore the most common effects of cosmetics- inflammation of the eyes and skin—without using animals.

The European Union banned animal testing of cosmetics in 2009, but the U.S. has yet to follow its lead, leaving decisions about animal testing to the manufacturer’s discretion. Logos seeming to represent a commitment against animal testing can be found on nearly every cosmetics product, but only one, the Leaping Bunny, can be trusted. Consumers should look for the Leaping Bunny, a logo created by the Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics. Recognized worldwide, this logo represents a “cruelty-free standard.”12

The Future: As far as cosmetics go, it is basic supply and demand, and the dollar is much more powerful than PETA. Once people stop buying products tested on animals, animal testing of cosmetics will cease to exist. Animal testing for medical research is another matter entirely, and unfortunately, there will not be an end to it unless humans are prepared to relinquish the medical advances that have made recent generations the longest living in history. Testing the effects of cosmetic products on vulnerable animals seems inhumane, but then again, so does PETA President Ingrid Newkirk’s infamous statement that “even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it.”13

Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1815241,00.html
2 Id.
3 Id.
4 http://www.amprogress.org/animal-research
5 http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/awreports/awreport2005.pdf
6 http://www.amprogress.org/animal-research
7 Id.
8 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5043328.stm
9 http://www.clearleadinc.com/site/cosmetic-animal.html
10 http://www.aboutmyplanet.com/science-technology/animal-testing/
11 http://www.idausa.org/facts/costesting.html
12 http://www.leapingbunny.org/indexcus.php
13 http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/h/2343-the-peta-principle-lab-rats-over-sick-kids;
http://rightwingnews.com/quotes/animal.php. 




Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 26 October 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.