Forgot Password?
Home arrow GreeniacsArticles arrow Waste arrow Waste Incinerators
Written by Lindsay Crowder   
Share |
Tuesday, 18 May 2010

Waste Incinerators

Waste to Energy Incinerators? Every year, our world produces thousands of tons of garbage. The United States alone generates over 230 million tons of trash, equally about 4.6 pounds per person in a single day.1 Only a small percentage of that garbage is recycled and the rest of it is incinerated or piled into landfills. But as landfills across the world are closing annually due to over-capacity or environmental degradation, the remaining garbage is left without a home. So what is the alternative? Many communities would argue that a commitment to “zero waste” is necessary to solve the garbage problem but others have found another solution: waste to energy incinerators.

The incineration of garbage has been around for over a century as a waste treatment technology. The process simply takes garbage that would normally be dumped in a landfill and burns it, reducing its volume by up to 96 percent. Many densely populated countries with little space for landfills, like Japan, France, and Germany, rely heavily on incineration as a waste treatment method. However, historically this burning process creates other problems like pollution, a release of other toxins, and undesirable odor. Therefore, parts of Europe and in particular Denmark, have found a much cleaner alternative in the waste to energy incinerator. According to an article in the New York Times, “this new type of plant converts local trash into heat and electricity. Dozens of filters catch pollutants, from mercury to dioxin, that would have emerged from its smokestack only a decade ago.”2

Waste to energy incinerators also reduce the cost of energy for the communities they supply, reduce their reliance on oil and gas as an energy source, reduce the amount of garbage sent to landfills, and reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere. Denmark currently “has 29 such plants, serving 98 municipalities in a country of 5.5 million people, and 10 more are planned or under construction. Across Europe, there are about 400 plants, with Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands leading the pack in expanding them and building new ones.”3 Conversely, only 10 percent of garbage is sent to these incinerators in the United States. And according to the Integrated Waste Services Association, “as of 2008, America’s solid waste industry operated 87 waste-to-energy facilities that generated more than 2,700 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 1.7 million homes.”4

Why is the United States so slow to embrace the waste to energy incinerators as a renewable energy resource? It could easily be argued that the issue of space alone is enough to prevent the U.S. from moving to waste to energy incinerators. Countries like Denmark and Germany simply do not have the same amount of land available to create more or larger landfills as the United States so it provides them with a necessary incentive. From an environmental standpoint, however, waste to energy incinerators should outweigh the option of landfills as a waste management option but some environmentalists tend to disagree. In the U.S., as individual states and municipalities decide the fate of their own waste, many state officials and environmental organizations believe that these new incinerators could potentially destroy their overall goal of zero waste within communities. Trash has more economic value and a lighter impact on climate change when reused, recycled or composted than when incinerated or placed in a landfill.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says, “[r]educing the need for new materials should be the top priority, followed by reuse, recycling, waste-to-energy incineration, and placement in a landfill.”5 Therefore, many waste to incinerator opponents believe that if resources are spent on new incinerators, these plants will be competing with the same resources as the already existing recycling and composting centers. The waste to energy incinerators are believed to essentially just put a band-aid over the trash problem and that a zero waste or an emphasis on recycling and composting is a better long-term approach to our world’s garbage problem.

In the end, an environmental victory in one country may always be regarded as a step back elsewhere. In Horsholm, Denmark where waste to energy incinerators are a major energy source and landfill space is over capacity, only 4 percent of its waste goes to landfills, 61 percent of it is recycled, and 34 percent of it is sent to the incinerator.6 Will that ever be a reality in a country like the United States, which has yet to reach its landfill capacity? The answer may not be known until it becomes necessary but in the meantime, it will be important to work towards zero waste.

Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://www.learner.org/interactives/garbage/solidwaste.html
2 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/science/earth/13trash.html
3 Id.
4 http://www.environmentalistseveryday.org/solid-waste-management/green-environmental
-waste-collection-recycling-process/index.php#
5 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/04/business/worldbusiness/04iht-rbogwaste.html?_r=1
6 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/science/earth/13trash.html




Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Monday, 07 February 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.