GreeniacsArticles
Land
US Land Use
|
Written by William Quinn
|
||||
| Wednesday, 19 January 2011 | ||||
U.S. Land Use
1Not to be a heretic, but this is my church: Arches National Park Recently I have come to appreciate using land in ways that I never would have imagined when growing up. Last month, for the first time in my life, I rode a snowmobile and a sand rail in the same week, which is an amazing feat considering I only drove a few hours to do both—isn’t California amazing?! When I was younger, I viewed these machines as invasive and disrespectful towards others attempting to gain sanctuary in the mountains. But who is to say driving machines in the wild is a “misuse” of the land? This is America’s land, and if that is what Americans want to do with it, then is it not their right? This begs the bigger question: Can we harvest all of the trees and use them for lumber, clearcutting the forests as quickly as possible, since it is the easiest forest management technique? America was on that track until Gifford Pinchot, the first head of the U.S. Forest Service in 1905, realized that there would be nothing left and took action to conserve the nation’s resources. Regardless of whether people believe trees are present for human consumption or not, without a “conservation ethic” the steady extraction of trees and resources through time is not possible. Forest “Conservation Ethic”: Pinchot coined this term, and this philosophy attempts to manage the environment such that nothing is ever depleted. I relate it to living sustainably. If society demands a certain resource, then we have to utilize it in a manner that leaves enough for future generations’ desires as well. Pinchot embraced the concepts of “multiple-use” and “wise-use” land management based on the notion that since this was every taxpayer’s land, the land use must be balanced, and every attempt must be made to ensure “the greatest good for the greatest number in the long run.”2 Under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, multiple-use policy is defined as: “the management of public lands and their various resource values so that they are utilized in the combination that best meets the present and future needs of the American people.”3 Wise-Use: The phrase “wise-use” has changed since Pinchot’s coining of the term, with groups now rallying behind it as a call to expand private property rights and reduce the role of government in regulating public lands.4 This movement supports some ideologies that align with the Republican party and held support from Ronald Reagan until he become the President, at which point he lessened his role in the “rebellion.”5 The modern day wise-use movement emerged out of the “sagebrush rebellion,” which was a movement in the late 1970s that attempted to gain public land back from the Federal government. Eleven states tried to gain ownership of public land because they “felt the land was rightfully theirs and that they could better utilize the land through extrapolation of resources.”6 7 The Federal government owns nearly a third of U.S. lands, but this number is much greater in the Western part of the country.8 Thus, most of the support for the wise-use movement occurs in the Western United States. The movement supports eliminating environmental-conservation regulations and opts for unrestricted logging, grazing, drilling, and mineral extraction—even in national parks and wilderness areas.9 Not surprisingly, the movement is largely funded by corporations, and they seek to reverse or eliminate laws such as the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Endangered Species Act.10 They have also been criticized as simply anti-environmental, since the movement spawned in response to the environmental legislation of the 1960s and 70s. Then there is the other side of the coin, often referred to as “deep ecology.” Deep Ecology: This term was coined in 1972 for the environmental movement started by the Norwegian philosopher Arnie Naess.11 Deep ecology strives to restructure how humans view their role in the ecological world. Its proponents feel that humans should “develop a less dominating and aggressive posture towards the Earth if [they] and the planet are to survive.”12 They strive for human appreciation of the ecosphere with the goal of reduced environmental exploitation and a symbiotic relationship between humans and their environment. Some criticize this philosophy as too extreme, and claim it puts the needs of the environment before the needs of humans—you do not value the life of a tree to the same degree as the life of a human, do you? Such philosophies have also been associated with “eco-terrorist” groups, like those seen in the fictional book: The Monkey Wrench Gang (which went on to inspire the creation of Earth First!—a group accused of eco-terrorism).13 For more on eco-terrorism check out: "Eco-terrorism" My Personal Perspective: If I were forced to align myself with either of these extreme philosophies, I suppose it would be deep ecology, but I also realize that it is unfair to expect this of everyone. It can also be flat out fun to use the land for more than photographing and admiring. The general principle is that people with conservative political ideologies advocate movements like wise-use, while someone labeled a “hippie” would likely support deep ecology. Pinchot is intriguing because of the balance of use and protection he advocated. He was a Republican, and generally opposed land preservation for the sake of wilderness or scenery, “a fact perhaps best illustrated by the important support he offered to the damming of Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park.”14 However, his management techniques, grounded in “conservation-through-use,” strike me as a perfect compromise through which public resources can simultaneously be utilized and protected.15 Inspired by Pinchot, I view living sustainably and cooperatively as key. There will always be opposing views, but ideally the government can work to balance a multiple-use agenda and the preservation of our public lands—everything from Yellowstone to the Pismo Beach Oceano Dunes. 1 http://fruitfly.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/drill-baby-drill-lets-begin-in-utah/ 2 http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/people/Pinchot/Pinchot.aspx 3 http://wildlifelaw.unm.edu/fedbook/flpma.html 4 http://www.pollutionissues.com/Ve-Z/Wise-Use-Movement.html 5 http://www.publicgood.org/reports/maughan.htm 6 http://archives.auraria.edu/sagebrsh/main.html 7 http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/914109-how-much-land-does-the-Federal-government-own 8 http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/914109-how-much-land-does-the-Federal-government-own; http://www.pollutionissues.com/Ve-Z/Wise-Use-Movement.html 9 http://www.pollutionissues.com/Ve-Z/Wise-Use-Movement.html 10 Id. 11 http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC22/Zimmrman.htm 12 Id. 13 http://www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000844.php 14 http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/people/historical/2/#pinchot 15 Id.
Only registered users can write comments. |
||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 22 June 2011 ) | ||||
SEARCH GREENIACS.COM
Latest News
- Indonesia forest moratorium won't meet climate pledge - Norway
- Kakha Bendukidze Holds Fate of Gene-Engineered Salmon
- Green Blog: The Yin and Yang of Conserving Land
- Climate models indicate likely El Nino return: Australia
- Gregory Jaczko to Resign as N.R.C. Chairman After Stormy Tenure
- Pollution-hunting robot fish take to the sea
Green Facts
-
If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.
-
A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.
-
It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.
-
77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.
-
In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.
-
Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.
-
Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.
-
American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.
-
A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.
-
Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.
-
You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.
-
You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.
-
82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.
-
Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.
-
Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.
-
One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.
-
Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.
-
States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.
-
Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.
-
Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.
-
A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.
-
For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.
-
Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.
-
Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.
-
Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.
-
Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.
-
Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months
-
Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.
-
The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.
-
Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.
-
Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.
-
You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.
-
A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.
-
Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.
-
Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.
-
Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.
-
In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.
-
Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.
-
An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!


1
7 