Forgot Password?
Written by Elizabeth Jones   
Share |
Tuesday, 09 October 2012

Himalayan Glaciers

In 2010 climate change skeptics declared that they had uncovered “glacier-gate.” They went on to challenge the statement that the Himalaya’s glaciers could lose most of their mass by 2035 included in the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report1 and point to this as proof that scientists were purposely deceiving the public about the realities of climate change . Who would have thought that one line in a 1,000-page report could cause so much controversy? Two years later it turns out that while the original claim about the Himalayan glaciers never should have been written,2 the glaciers actually are melting!

Major Rivers Fed by Himalayan Glaciers 3


2010 Controversy
Chapter 10 of the 2007 IPCC Report included the sentence: “glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world [] and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate."4 Immediately after the report was released, geologists started complaining about the statement. A prominent Indian glaciologist, Vijay Raina, wrote that there was no sign of an "abnormal" retreat in Himalayan glaciers. Jairam Ramesh, India's Environment Minister, went so far as to accuse the IPCC of being "alarmist." In response to these complaints, the IPCC's chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, announced that the Indian government report was "voodoo science" lacking peer review.5

IPCC chairman Pachauri was soon forced to eat his words. It turns out that the original IPCC statement was likely based on a report by the World Wildlife Fund, which in turn was based on a New Scientist Magazine account of an interview it held with an Indian glaciologist in 1999.6 The expert in question apparently said that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear in about 40 years, but did not repeat the claim in any peer-reviewed study.7 Another possibility is that the statement regarding melting by 2035 was copied incorrectly from a 1996 International Hydrological Program (IHP) report by Kotlyakov, which estimated that “extrapolar glaciation of the Earth will be decaying at rapid, catastrophic rates– its total area will shrink from 500,000 to 100,000 km² by the year 2350.”8

Regarless of how this misstatement ocurred, the repercussions were grave. Think about the magnitude of this error. As Jeffrey Kargel, a Research Scientist with the University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, put it:
You just can't accomplish it… If you think about the thicknesses of the ice - 200-300m thicknesses, in some cases up to 400m thick - and if you're losing ice at the rate of a metre a year, or let's say double it to two metres a year, you're not going to get rid of 200m of ice in a quarter of a century.9
Some commentators declared that, combined with the e-mail contents stolen from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, the credibility of the climate change science in general had been “undermined.”10 In response the IPCC issued a statement that:
[a] paragraph in the 938-page Working Group II contribution to the underlying assessment[] refers to poorly substantiated estimates of rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers. In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly.11
Nonetheless, the IPCC emphasized that the paragraph did not impact the “robust” science that the climate is changing as a result of man-made activities.12


So…How Fast are the Himalayan Glaciers Melting?
Unfortunately, scientists are having a difficult time quantifying the rate at which the Himalayas are melting. Only 50 of about 9,550 glaciers have been studied on the ground in detail. Many glaciers are virtually impossible to assess because they are at least 18,000 feet above sea level. As of 2010 a consensus has emerged among scientists that satellite data gathered so far generally shows glaciers on the retreat, especially in northeastern Himalaya.13 An article published this summer in the Scientific American noted a study that found that “82 glaciers in the Tibetan Plateau are retreating, 15 glaciers have dwindled in mass, and 7,090 glaciers have shrunk in size.”14 There does not seem to be much question that the glaciers are shrinking, but the magnitude of such shrinkage is hotly debated.

The debate is not only about the rate the glaciers are melting, it is also about why the glaciers are shrinking. It is hard to identify trends when there is so much variation due to micro-level climate and topography. In addition, while some glaciers are clearly melting, a warming world might actually increase the extent of other glaciers in the future. The Earth’s climate is also expected to get wetter as it gets warmer. Professor Michael Bishop of the University of Nebraska in Omaha says that the future of the glaciers is dependent on the local impacts of climate change: "If we have increasing precipitation, that might feed the glaciers and keep them around longer… However, if we had higher temperatures and decreasing precipitation, that might lead to their demise."15

How can we Analyze the Himalayan Glaciers Going Forward?

In 1921, famed English mountaineer George Mallory photographed the north face of Mount Everest. Eighty-six years later, photographer David Breashears sat in the same spot as Malloy to capture the changes that had occurred over the nine decades hence. Breashears acknowledges that two data points captured many years apart do not tell us anything conclusive. Nonetheless, having observed the Himalayas over many years he wanted to show the changes he observed in the novel way of photographs because, “[t]he data doesn't resonate. There is no imagery that corresponds to what we see in the charts." What Breashears does believe in is the persuasive power of high-resolution imagery of Himalayan glaciers and the power of visually witnessing losing ice over time.16

Himalayan Glaciers 1291 vs 200917


Regardless of which specific glaciers grow or shrink, one thing that is certain is that human behavior will impact the entire landscape of the Himalayas. That should be enough for us to give pause to acknowledge the global impacts of our everyday actions related to climate change , and to consider what policies and initiatives we want to support to change this trajectory.

Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch10s10-6-2.html
2 http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mistake
3 http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0121/Himalayan-glaciers-gone-by-
    2035-IPCC-mistaken/%28page%29/2

4 http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch10s10-6-2.html
5 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17155
6 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16221893.000-flooded-out.html;
    http://www.climate-resistance.org/2010/01/the-ipcc-and-the-melting-glaciers-story.html  
7 http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0121/Himalayan-glaciers-gone-by-2035-IPCC-mistaken
8 unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001065/106523E.pdf  
9 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8468358.stm; http://www.hwr.arizona.edu/users/kargel
10 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8468358.stm
11 www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pdf
12 Id.
13 http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0121/Himalayan-glaciers-gone-by-2035-IPCC-mistaken
14 http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/27/deny-this-contested-himalayan-
    glaciers-really-are-melting-and-doing-so-at-a-rapid-pace-kind-of-like-climate-change/

15 http://www.npr.org/2012/04/24/151206843/melt-or-grow-fate-of-himalayan-glaciers-unknown
16 http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/06/can-this-photograph-of-a-
    himalayan-glacier-persuade-people-that-climate-change-is-happening/259080/

17 Id.




Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 09 October 2012 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.