Forgot Password?
Home arrow GreeniacsArticles arrow Environmental News arrow Looking Back at the BP Oil Spill
Written by Will Quinn   
Share |
Tuesday, 12 October 2010

Looking Back at the BP Oil Spill

At the time of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill, I was interning in Washington D.C. with the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Once word of the leaking oil got out, government reports put estimates of the spill at 1,000 barrels per day, then 5,000 bl/day a few days later—a number repeated in the media ad nauseum.1 On the other side, BP steadfastly maintained that their greatest priority was stopping the leak rather than measuring it, trying to shift the focus away from the numbers that shocked and saddened the Nation?2

Congressional Hearings

Representative Edward Markey, chair of the Congressional Subcommittee on Energy and Environment (SEE), argued that accurate flow rate numbers would allow BP and the U.S. Coast Guard to combat the leak as effectively possible.3 Thus, the SEE held a briefing in May: Sizing up the BP Oil Spill: Science and Engineering Measuring Methods. The goal of this briefing was, as it sounds, to shed some light on the potential magnitude of the environmental disaster occurring in the Gulf of Mexico. What distinguished this briefing from the previous Inquiry into the Deepwater Horizon Gulf Coast Oil Spill hearing was its witness list…

The first hearing inquiring into the oil spill called for Presidents, CEOs, and Chief Officers from BP, Transocean, Halliburton, and Cameron to testify as witnesses.4 Not surprisingly, during their testimony, little attention was given to what the level of damage was and how much oil was actually leaking. The testimony instead focused on what BP et al. were doing to stop the leak as quickly as possible and protect the environment (we all know how that turned out). Increased transparency from these organizations would have better prepared the government, the people, and the cleanup crews for one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history. What I heard was more along the lines of: ‘trust us, we are working as hard as we can, and it does not matter how big the spill is.’

In search of actual facts, Representative Markey then held a briefing with third party professors and scientists, including the Director of the Earth Science Division of NASA, to estimate the severity of the spill.5 I attended both the hearing and the briefing and found the briefing far more informative… While it is not particularly surprising that the SEE would rather hear facts on the oil spill from third party specialists instead of those who caused the problem, it is still disheartening that the U.S. government cannot trust corporations involved to give an accurate representation of a real time crisis they controled. BP supplied the federal government with leak estimates, which ultimately turned out to be off by more than an order of magnitude, and the media plastered those estimates everywhere they could until third party scientists said otherwise. The point being, we should be skeptical (to say the least) of estimates provided by the company that ultimately pays for all damages inflicted, and should look to unbiased scientific estimates as early as possible. For those of you who didn’t see or read about the briefing, I will present you with some highlights of the expert witnesses “sizing up the BP oil spill.”6

I was particularly intrigued by Steve Wereley, an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. He gave a very straightforward, but highly effective demonstration of how to estimate the spill’s flow rate using image analysis.7 Professor Wereley “wrote the book” on optical flow measurement, and while having no prior experience with the petroleum industry, his use of image analysis techniques to diagnose the severity of the spill made perfect sense. On May 13, 2010, Michael Harris of NPR informed Wereley of BP’s video footage documenting the oil releasing into the ocean.8 Wereley proceeded to analyze this footage and presented his findings to the ECC one week later. He explained that the technique he utilized, Particle Image Velocimetry, had a 25 year history, thousands of practitioners worldwide, and could obtain accuracy as high as +/- 1%.

Professor Wereley really grabbed my attention when he posted a slide containing all of his formulas. The slide is a bit intimidating for a non-scientist, but once explained, his techniques were surprisingly simple to follow and very logical. Professor Wereley did note that he needed longer and higher resolution video—which BP would not supply him with—to give a more accurate estimate and to properly account for possible gasses that were escaping through the leak as well. Representative Markey announced that he sent a letter to BP requesting they make a live video stream of the spill, running 24/7, available to the United States public.

Convert to Barrels Per Day

At a time when BP was still standing by their estimates of 5,000 bl/day, this briefing opened my eyes to real science and evidence estimating the leak between 50,000-100,000 bl/day.9 Fortunately, the media caught word of this science and gradually boosted their published estimates. An oceanographer at Florida State University, Ian MacDonald, who specializes in the analysis of oil slicks, used satellite imagery to estimate the spill at 25,000 bl/day. He said, “the government has a responsibility to get good numbers… If it’s beyond their technical capability, the whole world is ready to help them.”10 I feel this is an extremely relevant point, and if BP senior vice presidents such as Kent Wells say things like, “There’s just no way to measure it,” that is even more reason to rely on outside aid for accurate estimates.

Professor Wereley’s mid-May estimates put the spill between 56,000-84,000 bl/day, and that was relying on a short grainy video clip that BP supplied 3 weeks after the spill began. An article from the Washington Post showed that government officials gradually increased their estimates every week or so, from 5,000 bl/day to 12,000, then 19,000, and in June to 20,000-40,000, which was a time when BP only had the capacity to capture 18,000 bl/day.11 In early June, BP also said they would be able to handle up to 80,000 barrels of leaking oil per day by the middle of July—but was BP still withholding information from the public about just how much oil was gushing?12

I am not preaching exact science here, but if the government had listened to scientific estimates from experts in their fields early on and demanded that BP provided scientists access to the best data available, then perhaps everyone would have known the magnitude of the situation sooner and could have responded appropriately. I will close with a quote from Rep. Markey which I feel sums up the situation concisely: “Right from the beginning, BP was either lying or grossly incompetent.”13 Unfortunately, that does not spare the U.S. government from criticism, as they may have placed too much faith in BP from the beginning.

For a great Greeniacs article on the BP oil spill and its repercussions, check out: Recent Oil Spills
Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://peakoil.com/enviroment/bp-estimates-spill-up-to-100000-bpd/
2 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14oil.html?_r=3&scp=3&sq=
bp%20oil%20spill%20may%202010&st=cse
3 http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2008:
energy-and-commerce-subcommittee-briefing-on-qsizing-up-the-bp-oil-spill-science-and-
engineering-measuring-methodsq&catid=122:media-advisories&Itemid=55
4 http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1997:
hearing-on-inquiry-into-the-deepwater-horizon-gulf-coast-oil-spill&catid=133:subcommittee
-on-oversight-and-investigations&Itemid=73
5 http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2008:
energy-and-commerce-subcommittee-briefing-on-qsizing-up-the-bp-oil-spill-science-and-
engineering-measuring-methodsq&catid=122:media-advisories&Itemid=55
6 Id.
7 http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100519/Wereley.Presentation.05.19.2010.pdf
8 Id.
9 Id.
10 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14oil.html?_r=3&scp=3&sq=bp%20oil%20spill%
20may%202010&st=cse
11 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/15/AR2010061504267.html
12 Id.
13 http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/104353-markey-bp-either-lying-or-grossly-
incompetent-on-worst-case-spill-scenario




Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Thursday, 10 February 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.