Forgot Password?
Home arrow GreeniacsArticles arrow Energy arrow Carbon Neutral
Written by William Quinn   
Share |
Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Carbon Neutral

Carbon Neutral is a term that gets thrown around quite a bit these days, so what is it exactly? Is it a goal, a guideline, or a gimmick? Carbon neutrality is at the forefront of any conversation concerning alternative energies or climate change . Of course, in order to attain carbon neutrality, we have to start off by cutting carbon emissions and developing carbon neutral forms of energy and living. So what is this omnipresent catchphrase and what should we focus on when pursuing low-carbon living?

Definition of Carbon Neutrality

On the surface, the concept of carbon neutrality is rather simple. A process is carbon neutral when it sequesters (or takes in) the same amount of carbon (or carbon dioxide CO2) that it produces.1 For example, many biofuels are considered carbon neutral because the energy comes from plants, which take in CO2 from the environment as they grow. Once the plants are grown, they can be used for fuel or energy through various processes, and through these processes carbon is released back into the atmosphere. So, yes, the energy from biofuel emits carbon into the atmosphere, but theoretically, those emissions are no greater than the total amount of carbon taken in by the plant when it grew. If the total emission of CO2 equals the total absorption of CO2, then you have a carbon neutral process. What is the problem then you ask?

Make It Carbon Neutral2


Let us look at the biofuel example. Is the “clean” energy still carbon neutral if we grow plants with synthetic petroleum-based fertilizers (for increased productivity), harvest and ship the plants around the country with petroleum-fueled machines, and engage in energy intensive processes to convert the plant from cellulose to a desirable form of energy? Most would say no, this is no longer carbon neutral. It is tempting to look only at the beginning and end products –ignoring the big picture. Plants go in, fuel comes out–sustainable! Unfortunately, it is never that simple.

Carbon Offsets3


Renewable Energies

Renewable energies can actually reduce the amount of CO2 we emit as a society. Since they rely on renewable sources such as the sun, wind, tides, geothermal, or biomass, they can produce energy without diminishing a finite stock of resources, and hopefully do so in a cleaner manner than traditional “dirty” petroleum-based energy resources and coal. Let’s say I want to create a solar energy farm. Now, I know there are carbon emissions associated with the creation of solar panels and construction, but this solar farm provides electricity for a community that is currently powered by a coal fired power plant (like 50% of all electricity in the U.S.).4 By getting electricity from the solar farm, instead of the coal power, the community greatly reduces its CO2 emissions and actually produces negative CO2 emissions over time when compared to the status quo of coal power.5 This same principle applies to other forms of alternative energies that replace preexisting “dirty” energy.

Now, the question becomes, what sort of balance should we strike between the creation of new renewable energy infrastructure and the continued production of energy through carbon intensive methods such as coal power elsewhere? For example, let’s take a successful coal company in the eastern U.S. that also provides many jobs for that region. People know its energy production methods are not the cleanest, and it is contributing to climate change. However, it is politically infeasible to remove this coal company from the region. So, the government proposes a sort of regulation to counterbalance the coal company’s CO2 emissions. They tell the company it must purchase permits to emit CO2 and must cap its emissions at a certain level. The coal company can then purchase permits from a renewable energy company in California that is doing a great job saving the world, but cannot compete in price with cheap fossil fuels. The coal company benefits because it can still operate and emit CO2, while the renewable energy company benefits because they are receiving money for being green. This regulation technique is known as “cap and trade.”6

The philosophy behind the “cap and trade” program is known as “carbon offsetting.” Carbon offsets are a way to realize carbon neutrality. Unfortunately, they add yet another layer of complexity and may ultimately distract from the real goal of reducing CO2 emissions globally.

Carbon Offsets7


Carbon Offsets

Carbon offsets follow the simple principle that carbon emissions from one geographic location can be offset by carbon reductions at another geographic location. Since CO2 emissions affect the globe, sequestering carbon in the Amazon rainforest balances out emissions from a power plant in China. However, many view this philosophy as easily manipulated and even morally reprehensible.8 In an era when many are concerned with their “carbon footprint” but do not know how to lower it, offsets are an obvious place to turn for help. It is hip to be green, but people also want to live life as usual, so they find an easy way to do both.

Some view offset programs as a way for people to repent for their climate sins. By purchasing an offset permit from a company, people can feel better about their non-ecofriendly actions. However, these markets are largely unregulated and someone is capitalizing on the sale and distribution of permits, thus creating false incentives to “get people a good deal on carbon permits.” Any offsets that sound too good to be true, probably are.

One should also consider that many offset companies are “offsetting” your CO2 emissions by planting trees around the world. Now, yes, trees do sequester carbon from the atmosphere, but they only hold that carbon for a finite period – maybe several hundred years. After that, the carbon is released back into the atmosphere, so this is not really a solution. Effective sequestration must hold carbon for hundreds of thousands of years, if not millions, for the earth to return to natural greenhouse gas levels. Offset companies are profiting from the concept of a quick fix and an easy way for you to be green and clear your conscious.

However, in most cases, you would do far more for the environment by reducing your personal carbon footprint through energy and consumption reduction. Charles Komanoff, an energy economist in New York believes, “[t]here isn’t a single American household above the poverty line that couldn’t cut their CO2 at least 25 percent in six months through a straightforward series of fairly simple and terrifically cost-effective measures.”9 Carbon neutral gimmicks, like easy offset programs, can distract the public from the hard reality that we need long-term public policy changes to combat climate change on a global scale.

How Carbon Offset Works


If only it were this simple…10


Cheatneutral example: Let us look at carbon offsets from a different perspective. A “company” named Cheatneutral was formed in 2007 with the goal of “offsetting infidelity.”11 Their message was so clear, and almost logical, that people actually believed they were a genuine service. Technically, they are a genuine service, but they created the company with the sole intent of satirizing carbon offsets. Are you comfortable with the prospect of paying another couple to stay monogamous whenever you are unfaithful to your partner? This is what Cheatneutral purports to do—create a market for infidelity, where cheaters can “offset” their infidelity by paying others to stay faithful. The concept is so off-putting to most that they would never consider such a system. Well, perhaps they should stay away from carbon offsets as well. Offset programs almost seem to condone carbon emitting, as Cheatneutral condones cheating. If offsetting is as easy as spending a few dollars, why would you change how you live? This is why offsets are potentially dangerous, and even morally questionable.

Is Carbon Neutrality in our Future?

We all want to live green and lower out carbon footprints, but we must take an active role in this process. The concept of carbon neutrality is great, but it is easy to get caught up in a web of confusion and fictional markets that want your money. This is not to say that legitimate carbon offsetting companies do not exist, but be extremely wary and realize there may be more effective ways to combat climate change than buying offsets. Take personal action: reduce your carbon footprint, advocate for renewable energy in your community, and fight for substantial public policy measures that will do the most to move our society towards true carbon neutrality.

Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides       Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://zeroemissionproject.com/blog/article/52/is-it-possible-to-be-carbon-neutral
2 http://www.ecolivingexperts.com/carbon-neutral-company/
3 http://keetsa.com/blog/green/green-business/meet-carbon-neutral-coffee-roaster-blue-smoke/
4 http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm_sum.html
5 http://www.solaripedia.com/13/141/the_power_of_the_sun_from_eco-logic_blog_(usa).html
6 http://www.epa.gov/capandtrade/
7 http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/04/28/weekinreview/29revkin.ready.html
8 http://www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/carbon_neutral_myth.pdf
9 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/29/weekinreview/29revkin.html?ex=1335499200&
en=d9e2407e4f1a20f0&ei=5124&pagewanted=2
10 http://www.itiair.com/co2offset.htm
11 http://www.cheatneutral.com/about/



Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 14 June 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.