Forgot Password?
Written by William Quinn   
Share |
Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Sustainable Lighting
With the world gradually turning its back on inefficient (incandescent) lighting, what should you use as a green replacement? The phasing out of incandescent light bulbs began several years ago with much of Europe banning incandescent bulbs in 2009.1 In the United States, incandescent light bulbs will begin to disappear in 2012, with nearly all banned by 2014.2 The U.S. ban does not specifically target incandescent light bulbs, but it does target inefficient bulbs. The ban will affect an estimated 4 billion U.S. light sockets, and once they contain energy-efficient alternatives, “household utility bills will be slashed by more than $18 billion a year, while the atmosphere will be spared 100 million tons of power plant carbon dioxide emissions.”3 Unfortunately for incandescent bulbs, no improvements in their energy efficiency are likely, leaving the market open for new forms of residential lighting. So let’s discuss lighting options on the market, focusing on: compact fluorescent lights (CFLs), halogen lights, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and electron stimulated luminescence (ESL).

Sustainable Lighting 4


Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL)

CFLs have received hype in recent years for their energy efficiency. Because they are a cheap and readily available alternative, most environmentally conscious consumers recognize them as the go-to green light bulb. A CFL bulb costs around $4 and is 75% more efficient than the old incandescent bulbs.5 They also last around 8 times longer than incandescent bulbs—10,000 hours versus 1,000 hours—meaning you will not need to buy them as frequently.6 CFL shortcomings include their narrow spectrum of light, producing what many call a “cooler” light, they cannot be dimmed, and they contain toxic mercury.7 The mercury is of further concern because it is vapor, and therefore far more easily ingested than liquid mercury (assuming you are not eating an animal such as fish that consumed mercury).8 Vapor mercury is very dangerous and should be treated with great caution during CFL cleanup and disposal. Further concern for the environment emerges when one considers where most CFL bulbs end up. California law mandates proper recycling of CFLs, however, only 20 percent or less of CFLs are being recycled.9 This means California dumps millions of CFLs into landfills where their mercury can potentially enter the groundwater supply, endangering humans and the environment.10 CFLs are cheap and efficient, but they are not the best long-term investment and may be doing a great deal of environmental damage.

Sustainable Lighting 11


Halogen Lights

Halogen lights render “sharp” light, are relatively cheap, turn on without any delay (unlike many CFLs), and do not contain toxic mercury.12 However, they may not be much of an improvement over incandescent bulbs when considering energy efficiently. Lumens—a measure of the power of light perceived by the human eye—divided by watts gives consumers a sense for the energy efficiency of their light bulb.13 Incandescent bulbs produce 10 lumens per watt, while halogens produce 15 lumens per watt.14 When compared to CFLs’ 50-60 lumens per watt, halogen bulbs show hardly any improvement over incandescent bulbs. Finally, halogen lights only live about as long as incandescent bulbs, which is not very long, and get extremely hot—creating a fire and safety hazard.15 When looking at the big picture, halogens may be sharp, but they are not sustainable. I cannot recommend halogens as a viable green lighting option.

Sustainable Lighting 16


Light-emitting diode (LED)

LEDs are commonly cited as the future of lighting due to their high efficiency, durable nature, and lack of mercury.17 The federal government, through the Department of Energy, has even invested $37 million in grants funding research and development for LED technology.18 LEDs have a significantly higher level of energy efficiency than incandescent, CFL, and halogen bulbs. LEDs range from 60 to 135 lumens per watt.19 They can also be extremely small, durable, produce a great range of colors, and last way longer than anything else on the market (35-50,000 hours).20 LEDs present many clear advantages over CFLs, but a few technicalities may prevent people from fully embracing LEDs in their homes.

Since most white LED light comes from the mixture of red, blue, and green lights, it produces a different spectrum than the sun. As a result, LEDs often make objects appear more blue or green than natural, and red objects are particularly altered from how they “naturally” appear under the sun.21 However, technology is always improving, and we may see more “natural” looking LEDs in the near future. Another interesting disadvantage of LEDs is their inability to cope with heat. They may be incredibly efficient and long-lasting in ideal conditions, but when exposed to hotter environments, the efficiency drops and the life-span plummets.22 To combat this heat accumulation issue, many LEDs have heat dissipation requirements which involve heat sinks or fans surrounding the bulb to keep it cool.23 All that aside, you are probably most concerned with the price, and therein lies the big problem with LEDs. Their initial cost is usually rather high—ranging from $40-$100 for a bulb. If you can average that cost over the life of the bulb and factor in how much energy you are saving, then they are definitely worth it, but spending that much money for one light bulb intimidates many people.

Sustainable Lighting 24


Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL)

A new company known as Vu1 (pronounced “view one”) has come up with an entirely new energy efficient lighting technology that uses “accelerated electrons to stimulate phosphor to create light,” a process similar to old television screen luminescence.25 They claim their lights are very energy efficient, provide superior quality, are fully dimmable, and contain no toxins.26 Their R30 (reflector flood light bulb) has a life of 11,000 hours, is 75% more efficient than an incandescent bulb, and currently sells for $20, making it more affordable than similar LEDs on the market.27 It produces around 30 lumens per watt (less than CFLs or LEDs, but substantially better than incandescent bulbs) and has a lifespan comparable to most CFLs. The biggest downside to this technology, other than the price tag, is the fact that it is brand new. General Electric or Philips does not produce these bulbs, rather, a startup company that is struggling to get their bulbs to market makes them. Vu1 claims that a standard “Edison type” or “A-type” bulb will be on the market later in 2011, however, the future of any startup company is always uncertain.28 Right now, these bulbs are not yet available for purchase, but when they do become available I would recommend trying one out!29

The Future of Sustainable Lighting

It is extremely difficult to find a perfect replacement for incandescent light bulbs. Lights like halogen may offer a sharp alternative, but they are hardly better when considering efficiency and the environment. CFLs and LEDs clearly dominate the market in efficiency, but they each have their own drawbacks, whether it be inferior lighting quality, toxic mercury, or an unreasonable price tag. ESL presents an intriguing balance between efficiency and light quality, but their future is difficult to predict without a product yet available for consumers on the market. The lighting industry is rapidly changing, so stay vigilant, and always consider the tradeoffs of every brand, and make sure to dispose of your bulbs properly!

Vocabulary to consider when buying a bulb:

Sustainable Lighting 30




Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/business/energy-environment/01iht-bulb.html?_r=1
2 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/20/us_energy_bill/
3 Id.
4 http://urbanbranches.blogspot.com/2008/04/earth-day-22-19-go-ahead-turn-me-on.html
5 http://eartheasy.com/live_led_bulbs_comparison.html
6 Id.
7 http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/the_dangers_of_cfls_even_great.html
8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning#Causes
9 http://www.californiagreensolutions.com/cgi-bin/gt/tpl.h,content=2153;
http://www.lamprecycling.com/articles/california-fluorescent-lamp-recycling-regulations.aspx
10 http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=50773&catid=188
11 http://home.howstuffworks.com/question151.htm
12 http://www.consumersearch.com/light-bulbs/halogen-light-bulbs
13 http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/halogen-lights-look-good-but-can-cost-the-earth/2007/06/25/1182623820498.html
14 Id.
15 Id.
16 http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/29/geobulb-led-light-bulb-uses-just-eight-watts-rings-up-at-120/
17 http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/green-energy/4343724
18 Id.
19 http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/08/white-led-lights-with-135-lumens-per.html
20 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-emitting_diode#Colors_and_materials
21 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-emitting_diode#Disadvantages
22 http://www.designnews.com/article/451284-Dealing_with_LED_Heat.php
23 Id.
24 http://www.vu1corporation.com/technology/
25 Id.
26 Id.
27 http://www.vu1corporation.com/spec-sheet/
28 http://www.vu1corporation.com/about/
29 http://www.vu1corporation.com/faq/#q4
30 http://www.toolbase.org/Technology-Inventory/Electrical-Electronics/white-LED-lighting




Comments (2)
RSS comments
1. 01-09-2011 23:41
If only between 5 and 10% of CFLs are being properly recycled, we have a huge problem on our hands. And if people cannot get their act together, it does not matter how much energy CFLs save; it is not worth the risk. Most people simply do not understand the risk nor do they care to learn. 
 
http://earth911.com/news/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/  
 
And who says CFLs practially look like incandescents? That is just false: http://www.jasonmorrison.net/content/2009/how-do-led-lightbulbs-compare-to-cfl-and-incandescent/ 
 
Incandescent lights are the most similar spectrum we have to the sun, and nothing else is quite the same yet.  
 
Check the spectra half way down this page: http://www.except.nl/consult/artificial-lighting-guide/index.htm 
 
The difference between Incandescent and CFL is amazing. 
 
Quantity of light is not all people care about, quality is still a huge factor, and safety for the public and environment should be consideration numero uno. For these reasons, CFLs are on their way out.
Registered
greeniac10101
2. 22-07-2011 07:06
CFLs are a better solution, both economically and environmentally, than incandescent bulbs, which ultimately result in greater mercury exposure than CFLs. While incandescents do not contain mercury, they still contribute to its release into the environment. Because burning coal to generate electricity releases mercury into the air and incandescent bulbs use more electricity over their lifetimes, they are responsible for more energy consumption and ultimately more mercury emissions than CFLs. In comparison to their incandescent counterparts, CFLs emit approximately the same amount of visible light and last 8 to 15 times as long. With a proven packaging configuration and proper disposal, CFLs can be used effectively without releasing harmful mercury vapor.  
 
If a bulb is broken or burns out, it should be properly cleaned up and recycled—it should not be disposed of in landfills. To reduce the risk for mercury vapor exposure, CFLs and fluorescent lamps should be safely handled, stored and transported to recycling facilities in a package that is proven to effectively contain hazardous mercury vapor. Find out more about how to minimize environmental risks and safely package CFLs here: http://vaporlok.blogspot.com/2010/05/layers-of-protection-packaging-used.html 
If a bulb breaks, consumers can learn more about clean-up procedures here: http://www.epa.gov/cfl/cflcleanup-detailed.html
Registered

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Monday, 18 July 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.