Forgot Password?
Home arrow GreeniacsArticles arrow Energy arrow Keystone XL Pipeline
Written by William Klein   
Share |
Tuesday, 08 November 2011

Keystone XL Pipeline
Are we addicted to oil? I think so. In 2009 the United States consumed 18.8 million barrels of oil a day.1 Another piece of evidence is our Nation’s pursuit of extracting oil from tar sands in Canada, a proposal to expand an existing pipeline to increase production by about 700,000 barrels a day—this is known as the Keystone XL Pipeline Project.2

To better understand the Keystone pipeline, let’s review our oil infrastructure…
Crude oil, the stuff coming out of the ground, is transported via pipes, trains, or boats to oil refineries.3 The refineries then “refine” the crude into various qualities of oil that we know as different grades of gasoline found at our local gas stations, as well as heating oil, diesel, jet fuel, and kerosene. So where does crude oil come from? Traditionally, crude has come from pockets of oil buried beneath the earth’s crust, where people (and later companies) could simply drill down, and the oil would come bursting up through the surface4 —how Bakersfield High School came to be known as the “drillers”! However, traditional oil production in the U.S. started to decline in the 1970s and this gave rise to the peak oil theory and communities. While there is some debate, recent efforts by major oil companies to begin extracting “unconventional” oil, such as deepwater drilling, oil sands extraction, and liquefied coal operations, clearly demonstrate that we are running out of the fuel that has powered the 20th century.

Today, oil companies are desperately looking to find additional sources of oil, and think they may have found gold in the Canadian Tar Sands. While they have known about these deposits for quite some time, only recently has it become profitable to extract oil from these deposits thanks to new technological developments and a decline in global traditional oil production. The extraction procedures are extensive and require a great deal of resources, which you can read about in greater depth in this Greeniacs article. So once this oil is extracted it still needs to be transported, and this is where we get to even more controversy…

Pipelines are by far the most efficient method of transporting oil, and extraction companies are limited in their oil extraction by the amount of available capacity of terminals to receive their oil. Oil terminals are in short supply in the U.S., with a few key terminals controlling regional oil distributions. In fact, the U.S. is divided into 5 regional PADDs (Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts), a relic from the World War II days when these districts allocated oil.5 Pipelines get complicated when they start carrying a variety of product gradients— for instance, diesel can’t mix with gasoline—so pipelines must be carefully calibrated and monitored. Additionally, pipelines must allow anyone to send their product through the line as long as the product meets the standards established by government regulations. If you are interested in an overview of the pipeline system, as told by the pipeline operators, take a gander at this pipeline overview paper.

Back to the Keystone Pipeline:
In essence, the Keystone XL Pipeline is in no way the first pipeline to be built. In fact, it is simply the fourth phase of an already built pipeline, the Keystone Pipeline, which carries Canadian crude oil to terminals throughout the Midwest.6 This is where the rubber hits the road for Canadian oil sands. Remember how earlier I mentioned that production is limited by the capacity of the terminals to receive the oil? And that anyone can use the pipeline as long as they meet minimum federal standards? All in all, this means that the Canadian oil sand extraction is incredibly hindered by the current infrastructure preventing increased extraction. There quite literally is no place for it to go… not to mention it has yet to be connected with world markets.

Now we see the big reason why the Keystone XL pipeline is such a big deal. It essentially doubles the capacity of oil sands production, while simultaneously linking the oil sands to the global oil markets by transporting the crude oil to the Gulf Coast refineries. While there is an increased flow of oil, there is no guarantee that this oil will ever makes its way to the United States. Once refined in the Gulf Coast, it is up to those companies (the Valeros and Shells of the world) to sell it, and they may not sell it to the U.S. if they can get a better price elsewhere. Valero, whom some might remember as a proponent of Proposition 23 in California last year (it sought to suspend California’s landmark climate regulations, AB 32, until unemployment dropped to the lowest level in decades), acknowledges that once the oil reaches the Gulf, it is fair game on the open market.7 So while Canada rips out their boreal forests and we face the risk of pipeline leaks—recent oil and gas pipeline leaks8 occurred in Marshall, MI, San Bruno, CA, Allentown, PA, and Laurel, MT—there is absolutely no guarantee that we will see a return on our investment in terms of oil production.

If the Keystone XL Pipeline is not built, then the oil sands must wait until another transportation method is developed. Many fear that Asia will come to the rescue and construct their own pipeline, which many translate into a concern that Asia will be taking “our” oil. This is an active threat, and could force President Obama’s Administration to make a decision sooner rather than later.9 Reflecting upon the beginning of the article, it is quite clear that we are addicted to oil. With articles coming out daily10 documenting the decline in production of conventional oil (which aligns with peak oil predictions), and the vast sums of money being spent pursuing these unconventional sources—Exxon is spending $37 billion this year alone searching for unconventional sources, and has spent $38 billion in the last 16 months acquiring shale-rock formations and developing procedures to extract oil from these sources11 —it is almost sad to see these monumental companies clinging on to their past ways, especially when alternative forms of energy are becoming so readily available. Change is always difficult, but it is also better to act when we have a choice, rather than when we have no choice left.

Because the Keystone XL pipeline crosses international borders, it must receive a permit from the State Department—thanks to a policy passed in 2004 by George W. Bush.12 As an additional aside, Bush also signed legislation that bans the US government from purchasing fuel with more emissions than conventional oil, essentially prohibiting the purchase of tar sands oil.13 Nonetheless, the permitting process is in its final legs now, having recently completed its Environmental Impact Report.14

Recent reports have revealed a complex web of interactions, in which former Transcanada lobbyists now serve on President Obama’s campaign and former Democratic operatives now lobby for the pipeline. Naturally these friendships resulted in the State Department rooting for the Pipeline’s success, and the State Department hiring a contractor who works for Transcanada to complete the Environmental Impact Review.15 This muddled mess doesn’t even begin to address the pipeline expansion project’s myriad of environmental effects—leakage in the Ogallala Aquifer in Nebraska16, the birds that die after landing in the oil sands’ tailing ponds17, the deforestation of the boreal forest18, not to mention the continued greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from these oil sources. There has been a great amount of controversy surrounding just how much dirtier oil sand extraction is from conventional crude oil extraction, with figures ranging from 5%-37% higher GHG emissions.19

Sure, this pipeline won’t itself make a dent in the nation’s oil mixture today (it will supply only a fraction of our total consumption), but it could represent an important milestone in our ability to beat our addiction to oil. The question we should really be asking ourselves is whether we keep pursuing increasingly expensive and complex fuel sources, or do we transition to newer technologies that can be implemented now without destroying natural resources for future generations?

Browse all Greeniacs Articles Browse all Greeniacs Guides        Browse all Greeniacs Articles
_______________________________________________________________________________

1 http://www.eia.gov/countries/index.cfm?view=consumption
2 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/27/business/energy-environment/
   us-state-department-to-allow-canadian-pipeline.html?pagewanted=all
3 http://www.pipeline101.com/reports/Notes.pdf
4 http://www.ceoe.udel.edu/oilspill/crudeoil.html
5 http://www.touchoilandgas.com/padding-petroleum-markets-a7-1.html
6 http://www.coqa-inc.org/20101028_Ha_Keystone.pdf
7 http://blog.heritage.org/2011/09/01/valero-hits-back-at-misleading-report-on-keystone-pipeline/
8 http://energylegislation.blogspot.com/
9 http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/31/us-keystone-oliver-
    idUSTRE79U5BV20111031 ?feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews&utm _
    source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2
    Fenvironment+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Environment%29
10 http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-25/oil-rises-to-
    12-week-high-as-declining-supplies-spur-bull-market.html
11 http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-27/exxon-s-tillerson
    -needs-record-oil-output-to-reach-growth-target.html
12 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-26/transcanada-s-keystone-
    pipeline-s-environment-risk-limited-u-s-finds.html
13 http://www.bsmith.org/?p=1351
14 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/30/keystone-pipeline-meetings-nebraska_n_988203.html
15 http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2011/10/former-keystone-
    pipeline-lobbyist-hired-by-obama-campaign.html
16 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/30/keystone-pipeline-meetings-nebraska_n_988203.html
17 www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aGVcoyIFnM
18 http://www.eosnap.com/image-of-the-day/destruction-of-boreal-forest-near-athabasca-oil-sands-
    canada-september-8th-2010/
19 http://www.greeniacs.com/GreeniacsArticles/Energy/Oil-Sands.html

    


Add your comment
RSS comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Click here to Register.  Click here to login.
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 08 November 2011 )

SEARCH GREENIACS.COM

Green Facts

  • Less than 1% of electricity in the United States is generated from solar power.

  • The World Health Organization estimates that 2 million people die prematurely worldwide every year due to air pollution.

  • Americans throw away enough aluminum to rebuild our entire commercial fleet of airplanes every 3 months

  • In the United States, automobiles produce over 20 percent of total carbon emissions. Walk or bike and you'll save one pound of carbon for every mile you travel.

  • Rainforests are being cut down at the rate of 100 acres per minute.

  • If every U.S. household turned the thermostat down by 10 degrees for seven hours each night during the cold months, and seven hours each weekday, it would prevent nearly gas emissions.

  • 82 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from burning fossil fuels.

  • Recycling 100 million cell phones can save enough energy to power 18,500 homes in the U.S. for a year.

  • Plastic bags and other plastic garbage thrown into the ocean kill as many as 1,000,000 sea creatures every year.

  • Bamboo absorbs 35% more carbon dioxide than equivalent stands of trees.

  • Shaving 10 miles off of your weekly driving pattern can eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

  • Washing your clothes in cold or warm instead of hot water saves 500 pounds of carbon dioxide a year, and drying your clothes on a clothesline six months out of the year would save another 700 pounds.

  • You will save 100 pounds of carbon for each incandescent bulb that you replace with a compact fluorescent bulb (CFL), over the life of the bulb.

  • Current sea ice levels are at least 47% lower than they were in 1979.

  • Recycling 1 million laptop computers can save the amount of energy used by 3,657 homes in the U.S. over the course of a year.

  • Americans use 100 million tin and steel cans every day.

  • States with bottle deposit laws have 35-40% less litter by volume.

  • Every week about 20 species of plants and animals become extinct.

  • Recycling for one year at Stanford University saved the equivalent of 33,913 trees and the need for 636 tons of iron ore, coal, and limestone.

  • A single quart of motor oil, if disposed of improperly, can contaminate up to 2,000,000 gallons of fresh water.

  • You will save 300 pounds of carbon dioxide for every 10,000 miles you drive if you always keep your car’s tires fully inflated.

  • 77% of people who commute to work by car drive alone.

  • Due to tiger poaching, habitat destruction, and other human-tiger conflicts, tigers now number around 3,200—a decrease in population by about 70% from 100 years ago.

  • A laptop consumes five times less electricity than a desktop computer.

  • A steel mill using recycled scrap reduces related water pollution, air pollution, and mining wastes by about 70%.

  • Refrigerators built in 1975 used 4 times more energy than current models.

  • American workers spend an average of 47 hours per year commuting through rush hour traffic. This adds up to 23 billion gallons of gas wasted in traffic each year.

  • One recycled aluminum can will save enough energy to run a 100-watt bulb for 20 hours, a computer for 3 hours, or a TV for 2 hours.

  • Glass can be recycled over and over again without ever wearing down.

  • It takes 6,000,000 trees to make 1 year's worth of tissues for the world.

  • Americans throw away more than 120 million cell phones each year, which contribute 60,000 tons of waste to landfills annually.

  • Turning off the tap when brushing your teeth can save as much as 10 gallons a day per person.

  • Recycling aluminum saves 95% of the energy used to make the material from scratch.

  • Nudge your thermostat up two degrees in the summer and down two degrees in the winter to prevent 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

  • An aluminum can that is thrown away instead of recycled will still be a can 500 years from now!

  • A tree that provides a home with shade from the sun can reduce the energy required to run the air conditioner and save an additional 200 to 2,000 pounds of carbon over its lifetime.

  • In California homes, about 10% of energy usage is related to TVs, DVRs, cable and satellite boxes, and DVD players.

  • You’ll save two pounds of carbon for every 20 glass bottles that you recycle.

  • For every 38,000 bills consumers pay online instead of by mail, 5,058 pounds of greenhouse gases are avoided and two tons of trees are preserved.